At start-ups, we often have to make quick decisions based on limited data. However, this inherent swiftness can sometimes results in bruised egos, misunderstandings, or misalignments among management team members. As we know, any one of these unintentional results can lead to corporate-wide inefficiency, spinning, and even turfiness.
I've learned through the years that, important as it is to make efficient and sharp decisions, it is equally important to have a plan in place for solving problems. I'm not a big fan of developing process for the sake of having them—too much bureaucracy stifles good business. However, managing expectations in advance on how future decisions will be made results in more long term buy-in and alignment.
Here's the system I've set up for my team…
Every choice we face falls within one of these categories:
- Type 1: One person serves as decision-maker and can reach a resolution without group input.
- Type 2: The decision-maker takes input from the group, but the ultimate choice is made by this one person.
- Type 3: The group reaches consensus.
This strategy can be applied throughout your organization, from the CEO level to team leaders. When you're able to quickly categorize a particular problem, it's easier to come to a swift and sure resolution. The categorization process usually takes us just a couple minutes to discuss and, afterward, everyone is on board with the direction we're headed.
However, if you regularly find yourself stuck on discussing the decision making process, then there are probably underlying problems with management team communication styles, cultural fit, or shared vision and values in your organization. That's a much bigger problem to tackle and will certainly impact decision making at your company. Take the time to resolve that ASAP, if you can.
My rule of thumb as a CEO or team leader, if you want your Type 1 decisions to be effective, is to make sure to be thoughtful when invoking them. It shouldn't necessarily be carte blanche for enforcing your will; often, it's a much better policy to rely on group input. However, there are some expectations that, as the CEO, you reserve the right for those Type 1 decisions. But if you use it sparingly, your people will know an issue really matters to you when you do!
Cheers,
Sheila